Safety Code 3. 5 Safety Procedures for the Installation, Use and Control of X ray Equipment in Large Medical Radiological Facilities. ISBN 9. 78 1 1. Cat. No. H1. 28 10. EHC Pub. Table of Contents. Explanatory Notes. This document is one of a series of Safety Codes prepared by Health Canada to set out requirements for the safe use of radiation emitting equipment. Ccna Crash Course Pdf on this page. This Safety Code has been prepared to provide specific guidance to large medical radiological facilities where diagnostic and interventional radiological procedures are routinely performed using radiographic, radioscopic or computed tomography equipment. Large facilities generally operate more than one type of radiological equipment, or have several suites of the same type of equipment. Most hospitals and computed tomography facilities fall within this category. The requirements and recommendations of this safety code do not apply to radiation therapy facilities and the equipment used in radiotherapy, including radiation therapy simulators, for localization and treatment planning. AssetFactory.aspx?did=3185' alt='Medical Radiation Technology Program Bc' title='Medical Radiation Technology Program Bc' />This Safety Code replaces Safety Code 2. A and Safety Code 3. The information in this Safety Code is intended for owners of healthcare equipment, physicians, technologists, medical physicists and other personnel concerned with equipment performance, image quality and the radiation safety of the facility. The personnel requirements, safety procedures, equipment and facility guidelines and quality assurance measures detailed in this Safety Code are primarily for the instruction and guidance of persons employed in Federal Public Service departments and agencies, as well as those under the jurisdiction of the Canada Labour Code. Facilities under provincial or territorial jurisdiction may be subject to requirements specified under their statutes. The authorities listed in Appendix V should be contacted for details of the regulatory requirements of individual provinces and territories. The words must and should in this Code have been chosen with purpose. Catalog1718_Radiologic_Technology.jpg?itok=qL5k4jgu' alt='Medical Radiation Technology Program Bc' title='Medical Radiation Technology Program Bc' />The word must indicates a requirement that is essential to meet the currently accepted standards of protection, while should indicates an advisory recommendation that is highly desirable and is to be implemented where applicable. This Safety Code does not address radiation protection for dental and mammography facilities or small radiological facilities such as chiropractic, podiatry, physical therapy and bone densitometry facilities. For these facilities refer to Health Canada publications Safety Code 3. Radiation Protection in Dentistry, Safety Code 3. Radiation Protection in Mammography, and the Safety Code for Small Medical Radiological Facilities. In a field in which technology is advancing rapidly and where unexpected and unique problems continually occur, this Code cannot cover all possible situations. Blind adherence to rules cannot substitute for the exercise of sound judgement. Recommendations may be modified in unusual circumstances, but only upon the advice of experts in radiation protection. Medical Radiation Technology Program Bc' title='Medical Radiation Technology Program Bc' />Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000 Global Events with over 600 Conferences, 1200 Symposiums and 1200 Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering. Learn more about Surrey MRI and the technology used for our MRI scans. We have a complete list of frequently asked questions for your reference. This Code will be reviewed and revised from time to time, and a particular requirement may be reconsidered at any time, if it becomes necessary to cover an unforeseen situation. Interpretation or elaboration on any point can be obtained by contacting the Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1. A 1. C1. Acknowledgements. This document reflects the work of many individuals. It was prepared and compiled by Mr. Christian Lavoie and Ms. Narine Martel of the Medical X ray and Mammography Division, Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau. Appreciation is expressed to Mr. Yani Picard and other members of the Medical X ray and Mammography Division for their assistance and advice during the preparation of this code. The contributions of the following organizations, agencies and associations whose comments and suggestions helped in the preparation of this code are gratefully acknowledged Alberta Cancer Board. Alberta College of Medical Diagnostic and Therapeutic Technologists. Alberta Employment, Immigration and Industry. British Columbia Centre for Disease Control. Canadian Association of Radiologists. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. Cancercare Manitoba. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta. Below you will find many nursing and medical acronyms for degrees and certification. This is not a complete list, so if you have suggestions or revisions, please post. Medical abortions are those induced by abortifacient pharmaceuticals. Medical abortion became an alternative method of abortion with the availability of prostaglandin. Sing Sing Sing Pdf Clarinet. You are now viewing all services in the Sutter Health network. You can change your location above to narrow your view to a medical group, hospital, city or Programs in the Health Science areas are designed for students to develop skills necessary to work in a wide range of careers available in the healthcare industry. Lists/SmallImageSlider/Attachments/2/browco-16-0474-Program-Spotlight-images_v2-tep_v2.jpg' alt='Medical Radiation Technology Program Bc' title='Medical Radiation Technology Program Bc' />Hpital Dr G. L Dumont, Moncton, New Brunswick. Ontario Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. Ontario Safety Association for Community and Healthcare. Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island. Saskatchewan Association of Health Organizations. Vancouver General Hospital, British Columbia. My Tribe 2 Rapidshare on this page. Work. Safe BCWorkersCompensation Board Northwest Territories and Nunavut. Introduction. Diagnostic and interventional radiology, are an essential part of present day medical practice. Advances in X ray imaging technology, together with developments in digital technology have had a significant impact on the practice of radiology. This includes improvements in image quality, reductions in dose and a broader range of available applications resulting in better patient diagnosis and treatment. However, the basic principles of X ray image formation and the risks associated with X ray exposures remain unchanged. X rays have the potential for damaging healthy cells and tissues, and therefore all medical procedures employing X ray equipment must be carefully managed. In all facilities and for all equipment types, procedures must be in place in order to ensure that exposures to patients, staff and the public are kept as low as reasonably achievable. Diagnostic X rays account for the major portion of man made radiation exposure to the general population. Although individual doses associated with conventional radiography are usually small, examinations involving computed tomography and radioscopy can be significantly higher. However, with well designed, installed and maintained X ray equipment, and through use of proper procedures by trained operators, unnecessary exposure to patients can be reduced significantly, with no decrease in the value of medical information derived. To the extent that patient exposure is reduced, there is, in general, a decrease in the exposure to the equipment operators and other health care personnel. The need for radiation protection exists because exposure to ionizing radiation can result in deleterious effects that manifest themselves not only in the exposed individuals but in their descendants as well. These effects are called somatic and genetic effects, respectively. Somatic effects are characterized by observable changes occurring in the body organs of the exposed individual. These changes may appear within a time frame of a few hours to many years, depending on the amount and duration of exposure to the individual. Genetic effects are an equal cause for concern at the lower doses used in diagnostic radiology. Although the radiation dose may be small and appear to cause no observable damage, the probability of chromosomal damage in the germ cells, with the consequence of mutations giving rise to genetic defects, can make such doses significant for large populations. Since it is not possible to measure carcinogenic effects at low doses, estimates of the incidences of radiation effects at low doses are based on linear extrapolation from relatively high doses. Due to the uncertainties with respect to radiological risk, a radiation protection risk model assumes that the health risk from radiation exposure is proportional to dose.